News Menu

At the Lab Season 1 Research Rewind: AI+

image of video slide for At the Lab podcast on AI

How do we interpret what AI tells us without knowing the logic of its own interpretations? How do we make artificial intelligence more efficient and reliable without fully understanding biological intelligence鈥檚 efficiency and reliability problems? This season鈥檚 final Research Rewind brings us from the realm of quantitative biology to neuroscience, genomics, and beyond. You鈥檒l hear from CSHL鈥檚 Kyle Daruwalla, Justin Kinney, Peter Koo, W. Richard McCombie, Hannah Meyer, Saket Navlakha, and Adam Siepel.

Thanks again for listening to Season 1 of our new podcast, At the Lab. If you like what you heard, be sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts, and stay tuned in 2025 for more breakthrough bioscience from 黑料吃瓜资源.


Transcript

Nick Fiore: You鈥檙e now At the Lab with 黑料吃瓜资源. I鈥檓 Nick Fiore.

Sara Giarnieri: My name is Sara Giarnieri.

Nick Wurm: I鈥檓 Nick Wurm.

Sam Diamond: My name is Sam Diamond.

NF: And this week At the Lab we鈥檙e rewinding several episodes from Season 1 that focus on AI.

{Music}

NF: Of course, that鈥檚 a big topic. But while the media focuses on chatbots and other internet applications, CSHL鈥檚 quantitative biologists are applying AI to problems in neuroscience, genomics, health care, and beyond. So strap in as our final Research Rewind is a deep dive.

{Water bubbles.}

NF: Imagine a black box resting on the seafloor. What鈥檚 inside? Your guess is as good as mine.

NF: In a way, artificial intelligence is similar. As advanced as AI has become, today鈥檚 computer scientists have very little understanding of its inner workings. That goes for today鈥檚 most popular AIs鈥攖he image recognition platforms and large language models鈥攁s well as more specialized applications.

NF: Computational biologists are now using AI models to try and better understand health and disease. These models can analyze a genome and spit out predictions about the function of different parts of that genome or individual genetic mutations.

NF: At least, that鈥檚 the idea. But there鈥檚 a problem. CSHL Assistant Professor Peter Koo explains:

Peter Koo: The tools that people use to try to understand these models have been largely coming from other fields like computer vision or natural language processing. While they can be useful, they鈥檙e not optimal [for genomics].

NF: Hence, the black box has remained, for the most part, tightly sealed. But wait 鈥 what鈥檚 that in the distance?

{Water bubbles increasingly louder with splashes.}

NF: Here comes the latest AI model from Koo and CSHL Associate Professor Justin Kinney. Its name? SQUID!

NF: SQUID stands for Surrogate Quantitative Interpretability for Deepnets. Don鈥檛 worry about what that means. What鈥檚 important is SQUID鈥檚 intended purpose鈥攖o pry open the black box of genomic AI models.

{Metal wrenches.}

NF: In other words, it鈥檚 built to help biologists understand just how AI goes about analyzing the genome. From there, they can fish out an AI鈥檚 most accurate predictions from inside the computer world. If right about now, you鈥檙e picturing a squad of SQUID-like robots taking over biology, Kinney assures us that鈥檚 not the goal here.

Justin Kinney: In silico [virtual] experiments are no replacement for actual laboratory experiments. Nevertheless, they can be very informative. They can help scientists form hypotheses for how a particular region of the genome works or how a mutation might have a clinically relevant effect.

NF: And that could bring scientists closer to their true goals鈥攗nderstanding life at its most fundamental level, figuring out how it evolves and adapts, identifying the root causes of diseases and potential cures.

NF: Squids have a lot of arms鈥攕ix to be exact, plus two tentacles. Likewise, the SQUID AI could have a number of promising applications 鈥 robotic cephalopods notwithstanding.

{Music}

Sara Giarnieri: There鈥檚 a symbiotic relationship between neuroscientists and computer scientists worldwide. These specialists come together in a field called neuroAI. Their collaboration both aids our understanding of brain function and improves artificial intelligence.

SG: CSHL鈥檚 NeuroAI Scholars Program recruits young AI experts to work with neuroscientists on campus. Last summer, Long Island locals heard the inside scoop from one of the program鈥檚 recent participants.

SG: NeuroAI Scholar Kyle Daruwalla discussed his work during Cocktails & Chromosomes, our monthly science talk held at Industry Bar in Huntington, New York.

{A drink is poured.}

Kyle Daruwalla: All the great neuroscientists at Cold Spring Harbor鈥攖hey provide the insights from biology that I use for my research, and I collaborate with them. And what I bring to the table is my background in computer science.

SG: Daruwalla trains AI based on how the human brain learns and adapts. Like the human brain, AI learns by making connections. But it doesn鈥檛 have the same neural patterns that make this process so efficient for us.

KD: Our brains are made up of cells, full neurons, and these neurons are connected to each other. And they鈥檙e not just connected to each other randomly. They have a very specific pattern to those connections. They鈥檙e very structured. And this is why our brains are able to do all the things we鈥檙e able to.

SG: The Human Genome Project took 13 years to complete because human biology is so complex. The same could be said for human intelligence鈥攖he product of millions of years of evolution. Now, scientists are looking for a way to help artificial intelligence catch up.

KD: We鈥檙e trying to port this idea of a genome鈥攁n idea of having a structured pattern as soon as we start out鈥攖o AI models.

SG: Herein lies the promise of neuroAI. With the help of neuroscience, AI could become easier to train and more energy efficient. That would make it more accessible for everyone. In turn, AI could teach us more about the human brain. This could lead to a better understanding of neurological conditions like Alzheimer鈥檚, depression, autism, and more.

{Music}

Nick Wurm: What鈥檚 that smell?

{A nose sniffs the air.}

NW: It sounds funny, but in many ways, that question is central to the human experience. Imagine you鈥檙e in the wild. Something smells awful. It repulses you. You don鈥檛 eat it, and you live to smell another day.

NW: Now, that鈥檚 a basic example, but our odor palates can actually become quite refined. CSHL Associate Professor Saket Navlakha offers wine tasting as an analogy.

Saket Navlakha: People can鈥檛 discriminate between two red wines today and then can discriminate between them after three months of taking wine tasting classes. What is actually happening in your brain potentially that allows you to do that? We鈥檙e providing one answer to that question.

NW: Navlakha is a quantitative biologist. He looks at big questions in life and nature like complex math problems. And he uses computer science to seek elegant solutions.

NW: In this case, Navlakha and his team developed a computer model based on how fruit flies鈥 brains respond to certain odors.

{Flies buzz.}

NW: The team found some neurons in the fruit fly brain respond differently to two dissimilar odors but the same to similar scents. The researchers called these neurons reliable cells. This small group of cells helps the flies quickly distinguish between odors that are very different from one another鈥攍ike rotten and fresh fruits.

NW: On the other hand, another much larger group of neurons responds more unpredictably when the fly encounters similar smells. The researchers called these neurons unreliable cells. They think these neurons might help us learn to identify specific scents鈥攍ike the notes in a glass of wine.

{A glass is poured.}

NW: But in case you鈥檙e wondering, no, this research isn鈥檛 just for wine aficionados. Remember, we鈥檙e dealing with computer models here. And as with all computers, data comes in, data goes out. Navlakha explains:

SN: Maybe you don鈥檛 want a machine-learning model to represent the same input the same way every time. In more continual learning systems, variability could actually be useful.

NW: Want to make AI more reliable? Then it needs to learn to be more discerning. And here鈥檚 a great place to start.

{Music followed by chirping sounds}

Sam Diamond: Birds come in all shapes and sizes. Just this morning I saw a blue jay in one of the trees outside my office. Right now I see a flock of seagulls floating in the Harbor. And if I鈥檓 really lucky I might even spot one of the bald eagles that calls our campus home.

SD: But what makes these birds so different from one another? To find out, we sat down with CSHL Professor Adam Siepel.

Adam Siepel: Birds often display very pronounced morphological differences from one subspecies to the next. They often exhibit sexual selection for particular prominent coat color or song changes.

SD: Siepel is an expert in population genetics. Recently, his lab took an interest in seedeaters鈥攆inch-like birds from South America. Tens of thousands of generations ago, these birds all had identical genetic codes. That meant similar feathers and birdsongs. But since then, they鈥檝e broken off into many species with different coats and calls. Siepel says the different species鈥 genes reflect these changes.

AS: When we sequence their genomes, their genomes are quite similar to one another. But they have local regions that are highly differentiated. These have been referred to as islands of differentiation.

SD: What causes these islands to emerge? One way they can come about is through physical separation. Birds may develop a new species when one group becomes separated by a large barrier, like a mountain range or an ocean. However, Siepel and his lab found that it wasn鈥檛 geographic boundaries that caused seedeaters to drift apart鈥攊t was something else.

AS: A selective sweep, when a group of organisms that carry some mutation that gives them an advantage over other organisms, rapidly become much more frequent鈥攎aybe because of a change of environment, a new predator, a new food.

SD: The sweep occurs when individual animals with a particular genetic variant begin to reproduce at higher rates. Siepel explains.

AS: In this case, we think the birds of the opposite sex found some aspect of that variant attractive, whether it鈥檚 coloration or song. And that helped push it to high frequency.

SD: From there, the variant individuals stay together, eventually forming a new species. Biologists are still trying to figure out why birds find certain colors, songs, or other variants more attractive. In the meantime, Siepel鈥檚 work suggests that the old saying holds true in evolution. Birds of a feather really do flock together.

{Music followed by heartbeat sounds}

Brianne Seviroli: When it comes to the heart, there are many mysteries. One in particular dates back centuries. It was stumbled on by none other than Leonardo da Vinci.

BS: About 500 years ago, da Vinci noticed a cobblestone-like pattern of muscles lining the inside wall of the heart. And for 500 years nobody knew why they were arranged like this 鈥 until now.

Hannah Meyer: Let me put it this way. They reduce the odds for heart disease.

BS: That鈥檚 Hannah Meyer, an assistant professor at 黑料吃瓜资源. Meyer took a holistic view to researching heart disease. She compared the organ鈥檚 genetic makeup with its phenotype鈥攈ow it looks and behaves.

HM: I was very interested in organ function as a whole. Can we use the genetics and these phenotypes that we can extract to understand more about the physiology of an organ, both in health and disease? So, we teamed up with bioengineers and with clinical researchers to try and understand a small phenotype in the heart from the perspective of how does it influence the function of the heart.

BS: Using special software, Meyer and her colleagues analyzed the clinical data of 25,000 patients in the UK Biobank. From here, the team was able to see how the heart wall鈥檚 cobblestone-like muscles, called trabeculae, work and develop.

BS: And guess what? It鈥檚 a lot like a golf ball turned inside-out. If you鈥檙e a golfer, you might know that the dimples on the ball reduce air resistance, helping it travel farther. Trabeculae cut down on fluid resistance. Hearts with the right kind of muscle pattern are able to pump blood with less resistance. Their trabeculae branch out in a shape resembling that of the heart. And Meyer鈥檚 team found that patients who have this going on are at lower risk of heart failure.

BS: Meyer has since turned her data-driven research to cancer.

HM: Every piece of software that I鈥檝e developed is on an open platform. There鈥檚 more than 20,000 people who鈥檝e downloaded it.

BS: And that means that thanks to her, we may soon have a better understanding of why many other organs look the way they do. Eat your heart out, da Vinci.

{Music}

{Bats shriek and flap their wings.}

NW: Imagine somebody walked up to you and said that one word: bats.

NW: Now, you don鈥檛 really have to imagine much. That鈥檚 the actual origin story of a recent Cold Spring Harbor discovery. Here鈥檚 CSHL Professor Dick McCombie.

Dick McCombie: A student from a course we鈥檝e been teaching since 1995 and who works at the American Museum of Natural History was collaborating with someone in my lab. She was visiting, and I always kid around with her. And I was pretty psyched up about bats at the time. And I pointed at her and said bats! And she said, 鈥淒ick, what the hell鈥檚 wrong with you?鈥 I told her how interesting bats were. She said, 鈥淗ave you met Nancy Simmons? She鈥檚 a bat researcher at the American Museum of Natural History.鈥 She鈥檚 the one that got the bat samples from Belize.

NW: Before we get to Belize, let鈥檚 backtrack a bit. Bats: what makes them so interesting? For you and me, it might be their nocturnal habits or their appearance in popular folklore.

{A vampire laughs.}

NW: But for McCombie, it鈥檚 not their legends or lifestyles so much as their lifespans.

DM: There鈥檚 a general trend that the bigger the average body size of an animal, the longer they live. Bats are real outliers in that regard. Some species live far, far longer than would be expected based on their body size. And they apparently have a very low rate of cancer.

NW: McCombie and his colleagues wanted to find out why. Enter: the American Museum of Natural History team in Belize. They provided McCombie with DNA samples from two species of bats, the Jamaican fruit bat and Mesoamerican mustached bat.

NW: Back at CSHL, McCombie and his colleagues mapped the first-ever genome sequences for these two types of bats. When they compared the genomes to those of 15 other mammals, including other bats and humans, they found that the genes responsible for bats鈥 immune responses are dialed way down.

NW: As a result, their immune systems might work more quickly and precisely, lessening the amount of friendly fire on bats鈥 organs and tissues. That could help explain their longer lifespans and apparent resistance to cancer.

NW: McCombie鈥檚 colleagues hope their work will help provide new insights into the links between immunity, aging, and cancer. And to think, it all started with one word: bats.

{Music}

NF: Thanks again for listening to Season 1 of our new podcast, At the Lab. If you like what you heard, be sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts, and stay tuned for more breakthrough bioscience coming in 2025. Remember, you can also find us online at CSHL.edu. For 黑料吃瓜资源, I鈥檓 Nick Fiore, and I鈥檒l see you next time At the Lab.